|
Trip to Berlin
Reise nach Berlin
by N. Richard Wagner
Copyright © 2006 by N. Richard Wagner, all rights reserved.
... [a] dark inevitability ... seemed to attend the progress of Berlin
throughout the 20th century, dragging all the rest of us along.
There is something almost occult in the nature of this city.
Its streets are haunted, and not by personal ghosts, but by the
ghosts of ideas, policies and ambitions ...
Only Berlin bears the several stigmata of Prussian militarism,
Weimar decadence, Nazi evil, Stalinist oppression and tawdry
capitalist excess.
This is largely because, throughout the 20th century, Berlin has
been a capital city. Here, the Kaiser's generals planned their
offensives, Eichmann calculated the logistics of the Final Solution,
Honecker's border-guards murdered citizens looking for a better
life, and for a few decades the gaudy materialism of the
Kurfurstendamm was the world's most vulgar proclamation of
democracy.
Jan Morris,
Review of Berlin by David Large.
(Local Copy of Review)
Introduction
I vacationed in Berlin from the 12th to the 25th of October
in 2006. This was my fifth trip to Berlin, the others
being in 1962, 1963, 2000, and 2003. In 1962 I was in
Hamburg for a year on a student exchange program with a Fulbright
travel grant. The Fulbright people invited everyone to get
together in Berlin in the Fall. I enjoyed the city so
much that I went back on my own for 10 days the next Spring
(in 1963). The stark 37-year gap between visits in 1963 and
2000 was broken by
a visit to München (Munich) and Linz, Austria
in 1985. I went to a computer science conference
in Linz, and before and after the conference I was able
to stay with a friend who lived in Munich.
In 1999, my son John, who was 15 at the time,
received a scholarship from the "Congress-Bundestag"
exchange program to study for a year at a high school in Germany.
They paid for everything, even the airfare.
He was assigned to live with a very nice family near
Potsdam, which is only a half-hour train ride from Berlin.
For privacy reasons I'll call them the Meier family here.
In 2000 I visited John and stayed with the family
for a week, and then stayed a few days in the center of Berlin.
In 2003 my wife and I visited John again,
giving her a whirlwind tour of Berlin for
3 days. She returned to the states while I remained for
10 more days. This trip in 2006 was also to
visit my son.
I know these visits don't make me any kind
of expert on the city of Berlin. It's particularly
dangerous for a foreigner to write of his "impressions" --
besides missing very much altogether, such a visitor
can commit two kinds of errors: first, seeing something
and completely misunderstanding it, and second, seeing
something that is understood, but falsely assuming it is
common or representative when it is rare. I've tried to
avoid these mistakes by talking with a number of Germans.
To further compound these difficulties, I don't speak German
as well as I would like, understanding and reading it much better
than speaking.
On this fifth visit I stayed away from many of the standard tourist
sights that I had seen before. My son John lives
in Kreuzberg, an interesting section south
of the city center, with a variety of people living there --
some sections trendy and some poor.
During the visit I took about 400 low-tech pictures, and
I'll stick thumbnails of these in with the exposition.
I'll also include other photographs from the Internet.
Berlin is divided into "Districts" (Bezirke).
Below are maps showing these Districts. Notice the
Kreuzberg district just south of the
Mitte (center) district, which is indeed the center of Berlin.
The map on the far left shows the status of Berlin just
after the war, when there were 4 sectors, as shown.
In [fill in date] the three sectors to the west were combined
into West Berlin, a part of West Germany, while the Soviet
Sector, also called East Berlin, was a part of East Germany.
(Officially the eastern part was called the
Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR, or
German Democratic Republic (GDR).)
This map also shows the course of the Berlin Wall
(die Mauer) erected in 1961, and opened and then
torn down starting on November 9, 1989.
In 2001 various pairs of districts were combined into single
districts in order to save money and be a more sensible
organization. The second map from the left and the
second map from the right show these larger districts.
Notice that Kreuzberg had become the larger
Friedrickshain-Kreuzberg, but people still talk of
living in "Kreuzberg.
The two pictures at the right below show the extensive forests and lakes
in Berlin. The area beyond these pictures also has forests
and lakes. Add to these attractions the absence of overhead power
and telphone lines, so often strung on ugly telephone
poles in the US, and the missing annoying billboards along
roadways, and one gets a beautiful city. (Berlin has high-voltage
power lines, but the others are buried underground.
We bury these lines sometimes in the US, but burying is more
expensive.)

|
|

|
|

|
|

|
Districts 1985 |
Districts Current |
Forests and Lakes |
| Aerial View |
Maps of Berlin |
* * *
Memories
I find Berlin a city full of dark memories. The Germans
have tried to forget some of these memories, or even succeeded
in forgetting. In other cases the record of events is explicitly
recorded and publicly displayed to keep the memory intact.
Berlin is not unique in this regard: in the United States
we also have our forgotten memories, for example with the
treatment of Native Americans and Blacks. As a specific
case in America, Brown University recently made public the
extensive involvement in the slave trade by those associated
with the school. This was a memory
that they have bravely reawakened after it almost disappeared,
as most Americans think the north wasn't involved with slavery.
See
Brown University: Slavery and Justice.
In Berlin all but the youth remember a city divided by the wall
(die Mauer) until 1989, but there is now hardly
any trace of the physical wall. Still, the memory of a
divided city remains strong, and most Berliners remember
where the wall was, while a tourist would have no clue.
Moreover, social and cultural differences
between the former East and the former West linger. For
example, there are at present (2006) more than 200 thousand
Muslims living in Berlin, but there is not a single mosque
in the former East Berlin. Current plans for a new
mosque in Pankow are meeting with strong
protests from people who fear an influx of Muslims into
their neighborhood. As another example, supposedly fewer
than half of all former West Germans (Wessis)
have visited any part of the former East since the wall
came down.
In Berlin many other memories from the past come bubbling up:
the difficult times after reunification; a divided Germany before
then, with separate stories that impinge on one another; and
the twelve years of the Nazi time. Some still remember
the time between the wars, and at least
there are stories about the first world war.
Just as we Americans have done, Germans have created myths
to explain or justify past events. One also sees ironic
juxtapositions in the Berlin of today: for example, the busy
traffic and fortified American embassy (under construction) right
next to the new Holocaust Memorial.
I have asked myself when the Germans were really happy in the
Twentieth Century, since it was such a difficult century for
them to get through. I believe there were two striking times.
On Saturday, March 7, 1935, at 1 p.m., German troops approached
the Hohenzollern Bridge in Cologne (Köln) and
crossed into the demilitarized zone of the Rhineland. This was
a decisive and daring step of asserting Germany's sovereignty
and power.
Thousands packed the banks of the Rhine and thronged the streets
near the bridge. The soldiers received a delirious reception
as they crossed. Women strewed the way with flowers. Catholic
priests blessed them. Cardinal Schulte offered praise to Hitler
for "sending back our army."
It was almost impossible not to be caught up in the infectious
mood of joy. It extended far beyond firm Nazi supporters.
Ian Kershaw, Hitler, 1889-1936: Hubris,, 1998, pages 588-590.
As we now know, this was a false joy,
the start of a descent "into the abyss,"
to use Kershaw's terminology.
The second time of happiness came on the evening of November 9, 1989,
when the East Germans opened the wall, partly reuniting a divided city.
Exactly how the wall opened up is part "urban legend", with Germans
telling different stories. The version reported in
the Spiegel magazine, 8 November 1999, pages 85-100
(for the tenth anniversary of the Mauerfall) certainly
sounds authoritative. It turns out that in part the opening
of the wall depended on the use of a single word. I give this portion
of the story below, in German and with a translation :
Original Text | |
Translation |
Dann kommt er [Schabowski] zum Punkt:
Allerdings "ist heute, soviel ich weiß,
eine Entscheidung getroffen worden".
Der Ministerrat habe beschlossen, "heute, äh,
eine Regelung zu treffen, die es jedem Bürger
der DDR möglich macht, äh, über
Grenzübergangspunkte der DDR auszureisen".
"Ab wann tritt das in Kraft?"
will einer wissen.
Schabowski kramt in den Papieren,
kratzt sich am Kopf --
so genau weiß er das auch nicht.
Hastig liest er den Gesetzestext vor.
Darin stehen Sätze wie:
"Die Genehmingungen werden kurzfristig erteilt."
Und: "Die zuständigen Abteilungen Pass-
und Meldewesen" der Volkspolizei
seien "angewiesen, Visa zur ständigen
Ausreise unverzüglich zu erteilen".
Für jeden DDR-Bürger ist damit klar,
dass er zunächst zur Behörde muss,
um einen Antrag zu stellen.
Und weil die Ämter jetzt Feierabend haben,
geht das frühstens am nächsten morgen.
Dann aber unterläuft Schabowski ein für
die Existenz der DDR verhängnisvoller Fehler.
Auf die nochmalige Nachfrage:
"Wann tritt das in Kraft?",
stottert der Informationssekretär des
ZK hilflos herum:
"Das tritt nach meiner Kenntinis ...
ist das sofort, unverzüglich."
Schabowski meint natürlich: morgan früh,
wenn die Ämter öffnen. Er kann nicht ahnen,
dass die DDR-Bürger ihn beim Wort nehmen und
"sofort" losstürmen.
| |
Then he [Schabowski] gets to the point:
Certainly "today, as far as I know,
a decision has been made".
The ministry secretary has decided, "today, um,
to make a regulation, that every citizen
of the GDR is allowed, um, to leave the GDR
at the border crossings".
"Starting when will that go into effect?"
someone wants to know.
Schabowski rummages about in his papers,
scratches his head --
he himself doesn't exactly know when.
Hastily he reads out the wording of the law.
In it are found sentences like:
"The approvals will be given without delay."
And: "The responsible departments for passports
and registration" of the people's police
"are being relied upon to give out visas
immediately for the exit travel of residents."
It is clear from this to every GDR citizen
that they must first go to the officials
to submit an application.
And because the offices are already closed,
that can be done the next morning at the earliest.
But then Schabowski makes a mistake which is
fateful for the existence of the GDR.
In response to the repeated question:
"When does this policy take effect?",
the Information Secretary of the Central
Committee stutters helplessly around:
"As far as I know, that takes effect ...
that is immediately, without delay."
Naturally Schabowski means early tomorrow,
when the offices open. He can not imagine
that the GDR citizens will take him at his word
and "immediately" storm out [into the streets].
|
Thousands of East Berliners headed for crossings into
West Berlin. The border guards became increasingly nervous,
as more and more people pressed against a crossing point.
Some guards feared for their lives as they decided to
open up the crossing.
A more recent and more complete story of how the wall
came down is in Die Nacht
der Wildschweine, Der Spiegel, 2 November 2010.
|